Philadelphia Violates Bloggers’ First Amendment Rights with Blogger Tax

Bloggers everywhere are in revolt over Philadelphia’s “blog tax” controversy. Philadelphia is requiring all bloggers to pay a $50 per year (or $300 lifetime) license fee.

Needless to say, bloggers have more than a little bit to say about this.

Regardless of whether their blogs make money, they are required to pay this tax — the city would like you to call it a “licensing fee” because tax sounds so. . . tax-y — all because a few bloggers made money from ads.A photo of a guy who has managed to wedge his head up his ass

“There’s often a blurry line when someone’s passion becomes their profession,” said Doug Oliver, a spokesman for the Mayor’s office, entirely missing the point of people who try to find their life’s purpose and make a living at doing what they love.

Their argument is that any business that has profit making potential, whether it’s through ads or any other means, must pay the tax licensing fee, even if you only made $3 from your blog.

At the very least, this is a nuisance and one that will be done away with once Philadelphia realizes how stupid it is. A step above that, it’s a First Amendment violation, and it’s going to take someone like the EFF or ACLU to step in and fight this. And worst, Philadelphia is only going to contribute to the brain drain of their city as smart bloggers leave the city in search of a less taxing locale. (Note to Philadelphia bloggers: come to Indianapolis. We’d be happy to have you.)

Other cities have tried requiring licensing fees for organized protesters and those were defeated in the courts under First Amendment grounds, so hopefully Philadelphia will be soundly spanked and other cities will learn the folly of trying to levy a tax against people who barely make any money doing what they do for their passion.

While one could argue that it’s “only” 50 bucks a year, or $4.17 per month, it’s the principle of the thing. Most bloggers spend hours a week on their hobby, often already paying for domain name registration, site hosting, templates. They buy blogging books and attend blogging conferences. They already pay to pursue their hobby, and now Philadelphia wants to get their grubby little fingers into everyone else’s pie.

What’s next for Mayor Michael Nutter’s office? What passion can they suck the life out of with another tax licensing fee? Maybe artists or athletes or people who grow their own vegetables?

What do you think? Is Philadelphia being unfair, or should they charge a licensing fee to bloggers? What’s the upside? What’s the downside? What’s to keep all of Philadelphia’s bloggers from moving out to the suburbs (or Indianapolis) and thumbing their noses at their hometown?

Author :  •  Content Location : Indianapolis, IN  •  Headline : Philadelphia Violates Bloggers' First Amendment Rights with Blogger Tax  •  Keywords : Blogger, blogging, First Amendment  • 
About Erik Deckers

Erik Deckers is the VP of Creative Services for Professional Blog Service. He has been blogging since 1997, and has been a published writer for more than 24 years. He is a newspaper humor columnist, appearing in 10 papers around Indiana, and in The American Reporter. Erik co-authored No Bullshit Social Media: The All-Business, No-Hype Guide to Social Media Marketing in August 2011, and Branding Yourself: How to use social media to invent or reinvent yourself, in December 2010 with Pearson. Erik frequently speaks about blogging and social media marketing.

Comments

  1. Erik Deckers says:
    2025

    Sean, did you read the whole thing, I did clarify that it was a licensing fee, and not an actual tax. Either way, charging a fee to bloggers who make money seems rather squirrely, whether that’s how they make their living, or they only make a few bucks from a couple ads. I don’t think bloggers should be charged a fee to blog at all. That’s my point.

  2. Sean Blanda says:
    2024

    This is an awful interpretation of the controversy and a perfect example of the knee-jerk reactions that lead to misinformation. There is no “blog tax.”

  3. John Fox says:
    2009

    Thanks Erik. I’m going to get my piece together in a few days. I’ll be in touch.

  4. haveboard says:
    2008

    It is not a blogger tax. It is a Business Privilege License. Misinformation is spreading fast. Please read: http://seanblanda.com/blog/technically-philly/on-phillys-blog-tax/

  5. Erik Deckers says:
    2007

    Hi John, Yes, I would be available for comment. Just email me at erik dot deckers at gmail dot com, or DM me on Twitter.

  6. 2005

    Awful. This demonstrates abject cluelessness about technology and the law. Philly bloggers, come to Indy. Philly politicians, resign in shame.

  7. John Fox says:
    2004

    Erik,

    Thanks for writing this. As a former resident of Philadelphia for 21 years, I can believe they would implement such a moronic way to tax basic rights. While I am outraged, I am far from surprised.

    I will be doing some investigative journalism on my own about this story and will be writing something for my publication. Would you be available for comment when I write my piece? This was well thought out and a very intelligent piece. Bravo.