<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How the Internet Has Caused the Current Economic Situation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://problogservice.com/2009/06/29/current-economic-situation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://problogservice.com/2009/06/29/current-economic-situation/</link>
	<description>Business blogging, ghost writing and social media specialists.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:09:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: paul lorinczi</title>
		<link>http://problogservice.com/2009/06/29/current-economic-situation/comment-page-1/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>paul lorinczi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://problogservice.com/?p=892#comment-634</guid>
		<description>Interesting....Robert Reich:  Trying to fix the old economy is the wrong approach.  We should be trying to understand the new economy.  

http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2009/07/when-will-recovery-begin-never.html
.-= paul lorinczi&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ProBlogService/~3/ofM28LOrZM8/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;When Ghost Bloggers Don’t Have Time to Write About Ghost Blogging&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;.Robert Reich:  Trying to fix the old economy is the wrong approach.  We should be trying to understand the new economy.  </p>
<p><a href="http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2009/07/when-will-recovery-begin-never.html" rel="nofollow">http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2009/07/when-will-recovery-begin-never.html</a><br />
<span class="cluv"> paul lorinczi&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ProBlogService/~3/ofM28LOrZM8/" rel="nofollow">When Ghost Bloggers Don’t Have Time to Write About Ghost Blogging</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://problogservice.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Lorinczi</title>
		<link>http://problogservice.com/2009/06/29/current-economic-situation/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lorinczi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://problogservice.com/?p=892#comment-606</guid>
		<description>I agree with you on this thought:

&quot;Rather than assigning blame for any of the changes to a particular new development, I would rather acknowledge a simple reality: that the world keeps changing, and the changes come in shorter intervals than they did in previous millennia.&quot;

I wish I had more time to research my assertions.  At a glance, the debate is not more spending, less taxes.  It should be understanding the real change that is occurring right now.  The Internet is a truly global phenomenon.  To your point, the speed of change requires new thinking to understand where these changes are taking us.  Is there a death to the old economy happening right now?  Are we entering a new economy?  What is it?  How do we define it?

Thanks for your comments.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Paul Lorinczi&#8217;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.lorinczipal.com/?p=80&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;What is social media networking?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on this thought:</p>
<p>&#8220;Rather than assigning blame for any of the changes to a particular new development, I would rather acknowledge a simple reality: that the world keeps changing, and the changes come in shorter intervals than they did in previous millennia.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wish I had more time to research my assertions.  At a glance, the debate is not more spending, less taxes.  It should be understanding the real change that is occurring right now.  The Internet is a truly global phenomenon.  To your point, the speed of change requires new thinking to understand where these changes are taking us.  Is there a death to the old economy happening right now?  Are we entering a new economy?  What is it?  How do we define it?</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Paul Lorinczi&#8217;s last blog post..<a href="http://blog.lorinczipal.com/?p=80" rel="nofollow">What is social media networking?</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Turney</title>
		<link>http://problogservice.com/2009/06/29/current-economic-situation/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Turney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://problogservice.com/?p=892#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Workers rioted &amp; destroyed factory machines during the industrial revolution because the machines were replacing skilled labor. 

Telegraphs &amp; telephones &amp; transcontinental railroads eliminated the market for the Pony Express before it even became profitable.

The development of the automobile destroyed the market for carriages &amp; buggy whips &amp; livery stables. 

Federal Express, UPS, DHL, et al have severely cut into the profits of the US Postal Service.

We can keep building a longer list if you wish, although I&#039;m not ready to agree with all of your assertions. Rather than assigning blame for any of the changes to a particular new development, I would rather acknowledge a simple reality: that the world keeps changing, and the changes come in shorter intervals than they did in previous millennia. Think of it as an economic model for Moore&#039;s Law.

The key is to identify which of the new developments will have real potential. To paraphrase Wayne Gretzky, &#039;It ain&#039;t where the puck is, it&#039;s where the puck WILL BE.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Workers rioted &amp; destroyed factory machines during the industrial revolution because the machines were replacing skilled labor. </p>
<p>Telegraphs &amp; telephones &amp; transcontinental railroads eliminated the market for the Pony Express before it even became profitable.</p>
<p>The development of the automobile destroyed the market for carriages &amp; buggy whips &amp; livery stables. </p>
<p>Federal Express, UPS, DHL, et al have severely cut into the profits of the US Postal Service.</p>
<p>We can keep building a longer list if you wish, although I&#8217;m not ready to agree with all of your assertions. Rather than assigning blame for any of the changes to a particular new development, I would rather acknowledge a simple reality: that the world keeps changing, and the changes come in shorter intervals than they did in previous millennia. Think of it as an economic model for Moore&#8217;s Law.</p>
<p>The key is to identify which of the new developments will have real potential. To paraphrase Wayne Gretzky, &#8216;It ain&#8217;t where the puck is, it&#8217;s where the puck WILL BE.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
